FOR SALE: BABY SHOES, NEVER WORN: UNABRIDGED AND UNCENSORED.

By Jason Edward Harrington

—-

For sale: baby shoes, never worn— the beginning of the great big goddamned dirty lie.

I was born in the mountains—Anytown, Appalachia—the son of a seamstress and a coal miner. The Depression was on and things were tough. Though I was just a baby, I still remember.

Sometimes, I think memory is my curse.

The first night it happened, Ma showed up drunk at suppertime again, eyes crazed and fixed on the only thing left to sell in our cabin: my baby shoes.  Pa had given up the bottle on account of the hard times, but Ma had taken a turn for the worse. This was before she started in on the Sterno; before the townsfolk had taken to calling her “Hellfire Martha.”

Pa rose from the table.

“Martha, no.”

“Goddamnit, Henry, I brought that baby into this world—made them baby booties myself—and I’ll sell ‘em downriver just the same.”

Thunder growled somewhere out over the mountains. Pa spat.

“His footsie wootsie’ll get cold, Mama. Cain’t get much for a pair of used baby shoes, no how.”

“We’ll put an ad up in the papers,” Ma said. “Claim the goddamned shoes are brand new. Never worn. I’ll figure somethin’ out. Now you jess get the fuck outta my way.”

The advertisements for never-worn baby shoes touched some kind of nerve with the people. It was right curious to Ma and Pa, but they never much stopped to question it, what with all the money coming in. After the first ad went up, Ma got a big check and a letter in the mail, blessing her soul and insisting she keep the baby shoes. Ma went on a three-day binge with the money, damn near drank herself to death— Pa couldn’t help but join in. When the whiskey ran dry, they came back for my brother’s shoes. Then our cousins’ shoes. Then the neighbors’ babies’ shoes.

Word soon got out, and the baby shoes boom set in. Those parents who would not sell had their babies’ shoes stolen by those who had. Quiet as silk they crept into our rooms, breezing in and out like the windblown curtains.

People tinkered with the words in the advertisements, trying to increase returns—For sale: baby shoes, brand spankin’ new and For sale: baby shoes, clean, stylish. For some reason, only the never worn version seemed to work.

Poet and writer folk were the most reliable sells. You could buy a pair of baby shoes from a Sears catalog for 35 cents, claim they’d never been worn in the classifieds of The New York Herald Tribune, and flip ‘em to a bleeding-heart playwright in uptown Manhattan for 5 bucks.

There were flowers, tear-stained condolences, expressions of admiration for optimized narrative compression. Ma and Pa couldn’t make heads or tails of what half the poet and writer folk were going on about. All they knew was that times were good.

“They kin talk all they want about suggestions of grief and weary resignation and all that kinda’ shit, long as they keep the fuckin’ fire goin’ in our bellies,” Ma and Pa would say. Once all of our feet were stripped, the town’s parents began crafting the baby shoes themselves.

Those ones really had never been worn, though not in any tragic sense.

Eventually, the townsfolk— worn out from all the carryin’ on, hands atremble from the liquor shakes— pressed us into labor: we were babies making baby shoes, and then not wearing them. Finally, Old Man Jenkins— out riding his jolt-wagon one night, drunk off the proceeds from his granddaughter’s slippers— crashed through the feed fence and lost us the whole mule team. It was official then: the coal business was dead.

The town’s livelihood clung to our naked soles.

As it started with the poets and writers, so it ended:  rumor had it some smug writer in a New York City restaurant copied our ad out on a napkin to win himself a wager; impressed all the poet and writer folk real special. Soon the ad was being printed and re-printed across the world. Cut the legs out from under the market.

Toward the end, it was mostly young people buying the baby shoes, in ironic fashion.

People have often asked me why our parents did not sell our toys and our clothes, too. Why not For sale: rocking horse, never used, for instance, or For sale: Onesies, never worn (which would have made for even greater concision).

Truth was, our clothes and toys made for better kindling.

We were a town of babies, stripped of shoes. We were mountain town toddlers with scraped feet. We were alive. Over time, the truth has been lost. But now, perhaps, the real story will live on, so that if ever they try it again—if they come once more for our shoes in the night— together, we will cry out.

We will kick.

—-

And Twelve Others Have Tweets for You: Four Poems.

By Postmaster-Twitter Dotcom (PhD, University of California–Berkeley)

Chris Brown crashes

car on eve of Grammy’s

reut.rs/URLFqd

I guess Frank Ocean can have that parking space now.

~~~

Claudine Longet’s Snow

Captain Beefheart’s Steal

Softly Through Snow and

other snowy songs, at@NewYorker newyorker.com/online/blogs/c…

~~~

What happens when a live condor

gets loose at

a hockey game?

http:// usat.ly/WbwCoe

~~~

Boring,

but not boring,

Curiosity drills

on Mars: geekosystem.com/curiosity-dril…

Room for Rent,  Starting July.

By Jill and Ross.

“Jason,” she wrote, “you sound like a decent guy. The house is actually the house we live in.”

I was disappointed.

“But since we are a married couple and its a 3-bed, 2-bath, we have extra space, and we like to help out students.”

It was true. I would be a student again. She knew more about me than maybe even I knew.

“The rooms rent for $300 & $350, one larger than the other, priced to reflect such. The prices do include utilities and wireless internet.”

I couldn’t help but wonder what else was included.

“We are very laid back about sharing,” she wrote, and as I read it, something stirred in the room. Maybe a breeze.

“Kitchen and laundry facilities, and don’t mind sharing living room space either.”

“We do have a small dog, but she is house trained and friendly.”

“The house is a good size and the backyard and patio are nice for entertaining also. If this all sounds good, let me know.”

It sounded alright, but I needed more. There was something missing, ever since I’d decided to leave Chicago. She tossed me a few last words.

“We can send you the rental agreement to read over, if you like.”

—-

Anthropomorphised Cat Pictures as Precursor to the Modern Day Cat Meme: A Comparative Analysis of the Works of Louis Wain and Harry Whittier Frees. Or: For Make Silly Old-Timey Cat Happy Time Now.

Author’s note: What follows is the greatest, most historically accurate and comprehensively cat-pictured humor essay to ever fuse the great cat artists Louis Wain and Harry Whittier Frees, in all of human history.

It is also the only one.

—-

Anthropomorphised Cat Pictures as Precursor to the Modern Day Cat Meme: A Comparative Analysis of the Works of Louis Wain and Harry Whittier Frees.

or:

For Make Silly Old-Timey Cat Happy Time Now.

by Jason Harrington

Silly cat pictures.  After the internet really exploded onto the world scene, it didn’t take long for silly pictures of cats to come along and infect the entire thing, like a highly malicious, mind-controlling virus. Toxoplasmosis, perhaps. The primary culprits were “lolcats,” which were born somewhere in the bowels of  the 4chan forums, one ominous Saturday, or “Caturday,” morning circa 2005, best anyone can tell.

But did you know that extremely silly cat pictures have been around for a very long time? The infamous lolcat memes, with their patented, silly,  anthropomorphised pictures of cats aren’t nearly as new as you think. The man who really first nailed the nauseatingly cutesy formula as we now know it was a man named Harry Whittier Frees, an American photographer who lived from 1879-1953.

Frees dealt primarily in postcards and children’s books, wherein he dressed cats and other animals  in human clothes, posed them in human situations with props, and captioned the photos with old timey versions of things that passed for hilarious back then. Although he dealt with various species, for Frees, it all began and ended with cats.

He was sitting around the dinner table with his family in Audobon, Pennsylvania, back in 1906, when one of the family members passed a paper hat around the table. Each family member took turns wearing the hat, until the hat reached the family cat, at which point Frees rapturously cried “Eureka!”, assembled his old timey camera, and it was thus that silly cat photos were born, for the masses.

And it was Good.

Frees worked hard at his newfound calling in life, and ended up making quite a good living off of his silly animals- dressed-as-people photos. He borrowed his four legged subjects from friends and neighbors, and actually found them quite difficult to work with; for instance, flies were terribly distracting to cats,  making for especially difficult photo ops, so he had to make sure there were no flies in his studio when doing his old timey shoots. He  worked only 3 months out of the year. The rest of the year, he actually spent recuperating from  his epic cutesy animal shoots, and meticulously planning the details for his next shoots. As you can see, some of them were, apparently, extraordinarily involved, to the point that they likely did require 9 months of post-shoot recuperation.

How long did it take to get that uncanny school teacher expression on the kitty on the left? Frees, you magnificent bastard.

His exposures were taken at 1/5th of a second, and two-thirds of the negatives had to be discarded. Over the course of his career, Frees became quite the expert in anthropomorphised animal photography. Noting that:

“Rabbits are the easiest to photograph in costume, but incapable ot taking  many ‘human’ parts.  Puppies are tractable when rightly understood, but the kitten is the most versatile animal actor, and possesses the greatest variety of appeal.”

Two kittens on the left are clearly repulsed by the rabbit. One on the right wants a piece of that casserole. Bad.

(Note that the above caption is Frees’, not mine. Apparently, pigs really are extraordinarily difficult to work with, when it comes to playing dress up.  A hard, cold fact that Frees, along with all my ex-girlfriends, certainly came to find out.)

Yes, back in the olden days, a photo such as this one—

–most likely had people laughing out loud, since back then all it took to elicit uproarious laughter from children and simple-minded adults was a picture of a cat dressed as a human asking an amusing question. These days, of course, humor has taken on  a much more sophisticated nature and-

–OK, actually, disregard that last part. Some things never change, it seems, and while Frees is commonly known as the first one to do the nauseating cutesy Lolcat thing in his own, very artistic…

…unquestionably quaint…

…sometimes eerie-

–way, there was one man who was doing something  very similar even before Frees. And in a much more profound, intensely batshit insane manner. The Cat Master. The Godfather of Cutesy Cat Pictures…

Louis Wain- The Cat Guy

(1860-1939)

If Louis Wain were around today, he would probably be an internet meme superstar. Born in 1860, Wain was far ahead of his time in realizing one thing: people like absurd pictures of cats.

At the age of 23,  after dabbling in landscape and various animal-themed paintings,  Wain kicked off his career in cats by marrying a cougar, Emily Richardson, a woman ten years his senior.

The two lived together in a cozy little home in Hampsted, north London. Sadly, Emily soon began to suffer from cancer, dying just three years after they had tied the knot. It was during this period that Wain discovered the subject that would define his career.

During her illness, Emily was comforted by their pet cat, Peter. Wain taught him tricks such as wearing spectacles and pretending to read in order to amuse Emily. He began to draw extensive sketches of the large black and white cat. He later wrote of Peter:

“To him properly belongs the foundation of my career, the developments of my initial efforts, and the establishing of my work.” (Many of Wain’s early cat paintings are, in fact, portraits of Peter.)

By that point, it was all over. Wain had zeroed in on his forte, and that was it: he painted nothing but cats for the rest of his life, descending into a monomaniacal feline obsession.

Yes, Wain went on to paint cats, all kinds of cats: asshole bourgeois cats-

Everycat soldiers in the trenches of war cats–

-cats going Paginini on a violin-

-cats going  Tiny Tim on a banjo-

-cats smoking blunts-

Yes, it was just cats on top of cats for lil’ Wain, and his cat pictures were all the rage in Victorian England, often being used in prints, greeting cards and satirical illustrations.

Wain was a prolific  with an easel and a cat, producing as many as several hundred drawings a year. He illustrated about one hundred children’s books, his pussies appearing in papers, journals, and magazines, including the Louis Wain Annual, which ran from 1901 to 1915. His work was also regularly reproduced on picture postcards which are highly sought after by collectors today.

In 1898 and 1911 he was chairman, not surprisingly, of the National Cat Club, and was also an active member of  the Society for the Protection of Cats. Toward the end of his life, he claimed that he had “helped to wipe out the contempt in which the cat has been held” in England. Indeed, Wain was quite the cat crusader, walking around England with kitty-tinted glasses. As Wain himself put it:

“I take a sketch-book to a restaurant, or other public place, and draw the people in their different positions as cats, getting as near to their human characteristics as possible. This gives me doubly nature, and these studies I think to be my best humorous work.”

Having obtained his doubly (emphasis his, not mine– yes, he was losing it) nature, as well as having established cat studies as an official humor category well over a century before lolcats was even an annoying twinkle in some asshole’s eye, Wain somehow managed to  descend even further into cat-based insanity, by actually going insane himself and being admitted to a squalid mental institute in London. (Mental illness  ran in his family; his sister had been admitted when Wain was 30.)

Luckily for Wain, he had built quite a high powered fanbase by that point; he had developed Cat Powers that came with kitty strings– strings that no less than H.G. Wells and the Prime Minister of England pulled to  bail him out of  there (no, I’m not making this up ).

Wain’s high profile benefactors had him transferred to a much more pleasant crazy house, the Napsbury Hospital, just north of London, which came replete with -–you guessed it-– a colony of cats. It was there that Wain lived out the rest of his life, presumably in bliss, because really, what more can one ask for than a mental institute to call home, a paint brush and easel, and a colony of cats. Today, his paintings are actually used in psychology classes to illustrate an artist’s descent into schizophrenia.

Many modern day medical experts speculate that Wain’s schizophrenia  may have been brought on by toxoplasmosis, a parasitic infection often carried and transmitted by warm blooded animals, but most often by…must I even say it? (Cats.)

See his descent into madness, captured, oil on canvas, below…

“During the onset of his disease at 57, Wain continued to paint, draw and sketch cats, but the focus changed from fanciful situations, to focus on the cats themselves.”

Hearing voices at this point.

OK, who gave the cat acid?

“Characteristic changes in the art began to occur, changes common to schizophrenic artists. Jagged lines of bright color began emanating from his feline subjects. The outlines of the cats became severe and spiky, and their outlines persisted well throughout the sketches, as if they were throwing off energy.”

“Soon the cats became abstracted, seeming now to be made up of hundreds of small repetitive shapes, coming together in a clashing jangles of color that transform the cat into something resembling an Eastern deity.”

“The abstraction continued, the cats now being seen as made up by small repeating patterns, almost fractal in nature. Until finally they ceased to resemble cats at all, and became the ultimate abstraction, an indistinct form made up by near symmetrical repeating patterns.”

And finally, all together now, this is the official progression that many psychologists use in classes to illustrate an artist’s descent  into schizophrenia:

And that, my friends, concludes this field trip.

Psycho-critique from Cornell University.

The News of the Amish World

THE NEWS OF THE AMISH WORLD.

The County’s Greatest Newsletter, 1843-2011 (1843)

We are sorry.

For myriad generations, The News of the Amish World had been at the heart of Holmes County’s Amish news hub. Today, our hearts are saddled with great sorrow in light of the recent evidence that reporter Samuel Yoder, under the watch of editor Ruth Edna Brookstetler, and in order to obtain details pertaining to certain stories, had used a device.

Over the past 168 years, the various developments of our ever-changing world–  the buggy, the grey-painted buggy, the charcoal grey buggy, the Davy’s grey buggy, and, of course, the printing press– have been faithfully recorded by this letter of record. Many defining moments graced the headlines of This Old Letter. Who could forget, for instance, our classic coverage of such seminal events as:

-The Suspender Rebellion.

-Jacob Hochstetler’s installation of a pedal on his bicycle, and subsequent excommunication.

-Martha Ellen Schwartz’s under-the-table dealings with the Arts and Crafts industry.

-The series of investigations into the Lengacher subprime barley trading scandal. 

- The exposé on Silo Tom’s refusal to shave his mustache, and subsequent excommunication.

And of course:

-Paintedgate.

When I, Rufus Merdberger, first took the reins of this newsletter in 1969, it was copied out by hand and saw a distribution of approximately 7 households. After my introduction of the diesel-powered printer press to the Swartzendruber’s barn in 1973, those numbers jumped to 58 households, spanning 3 counties.

Though some accused The News of becoming excessively proud under my ownership– pointing to the letter’s somewhat “sensational” stories of our youths’ activities during their rumspringa–  and myself of being shameless and exploitative, I know in my heart of hearts that I am just a harness maker, first and foremost, and a populist, market-attuned newsletter man, second, who is simply in the business of giving the people what they want.

And the Hershbergers, Troyers, Schrocks, Grabers, Hiltys and the Wittmers want what the Hershbergers, Troyers, Schrocks, Grabers, Hiltys and the Wittmers want.

It was during some of the more recent rumspringa stories that , entirely unbeknownst to me or my son at the time, Samuel Yoder, with the explicit approval of his editor, began wearing a hearing aid in order to better listen through bedroom doors and report back on the exploits of our youths during their running around.  This breach of Ordnung trust and ethical conduct (and, to be fair, common practice among competing newsletters jostling for coverage concerning running-around) once uncovered, was, of course, brought before the bi-annual meeting of our elders (of which I myself am a part of), and Yoder was duly shunned. We considered the matter settled, until the revelations of yesterday forenoon, in which it was revealed that Yoder had continued to use a hearing aid in order to listen in on conversations among the family members of those injured in the recent buggy flipping. While I personally found that these unsavory tactics could perhaps be overlooked in regards to youth in rumspringa, this most recent turn of events has brought a dark stain upon this newsletter’s reputation, one which can never be laved.  

At this point, there is unfortunately no other option than to shut the letter down.

As to the unfolding allegations of Panasonic H.264 Pan/Tilt Network Surveillance cameras  being hidden by other News reporters (who, it should be noted, all received and were required to read a copy of our Standards of Business Conduct pamphlet) in the bedrooms of our womenfolk in exchange for paid compensation from the Englisher website “Amish Amateurs,” you may be rest assured, further shunnings are imminent, and that the full brunt of our law will be brought to bear upon them, so that they may be harshly punished and wholeheartedly forgiven.

For the record, my son and I knew nothing of the above activities, any profits derived from them, or, for that matter, what they even mean, for we are, after all, just simple, humble, Amish folk.

Thank you, and goodbye. 

-Rufus Merdberger, Keeper of the Printing Press